The Notion of Social Benefits

George Soros had a commentary run in the FT late on Thursday and while the main focus was not of great utility there was a comment in passing that got me thinking a little bit. In talking about the Goldman Sachs story and derivatives he noted that “whether or not Goldman is guilty, the transaction in question clearly had no social benefit.”

The notion of social benefit is interesting. Does anyone have any obligation to even consider social benefit? Is it better to assume that no one cares about social benefit instead caring only about themselves or their bonus or their clientele or their own account as the case may be?

Everyone needs to answer this sort of thing for themselves as there are plenty of right answers.

For individual investors I cannot imagine why anyone would have social benefit in the context of financial matters as a priority. Between benefiting society and not benefiting society I would prefer the former (I’ve been a volunteer firefighter for seven years and counting, been giving away content on the internet for five and half years and my wife is a full time volunteer in animal rescue) but where personal finances are concerned the typical individual does not have the opportunity to be an agent for social benefit or the like.

Making a high priority out of social benefit for individuals becomes even less important if the typical social safety nets (entitlements) end up not being there. perhaps a little Ayn Randian looking out for your own makes the most sense–that is making sure you can take care of what benefits you first and foremost and if you have time left over for the other so be it. Let me be clear that I believe in a living a life of service but successfully protecting your finances from dishonest people, overly flawed investment products and your own emotions is what makes the other stuff possible.

I will tie this in to properly understanding what is important financially. For most people it is simply giving yourself the best chance possible for having enough money when you need it. A point I make often is that beating the market in a given year means a whole lot less than having enough when the time comes. The best way to come at this, IMO, is to save a lot and have some strategy to avoid the full brunt of down a lot (smooth out your ride).

My personal priority is our clients for the selfish reason that is is where my bread is buttered. Thanks to a low overhead we save more than we live on and I have no intention of retiring from this which means very little of our savings needs to be exposed to risk assets so doing anything to jeopardize this dynamic would be sheer lunacy. I am acutely aware of our good luck.

To the original point, taking care of your own yoga mat first and then sorting out everything else will help you solve a lot of this for yourself. I can appreciate the extent to which this sounds preachy but I am very personally motivated to eliminate stress and negative energy from my life and I think this happens by figuring out priorities and avoiding certain situations like being down 50% in your portfolio.

About Roger Nusbaum 169 Articles

Roger Nusbaum is an Arizona-based financial advisor who builds and manages client portfolios using a mix of individual stocks and ETFs. Roger writes a popular blog, which focuses on risk management, foreign stocks, exchange traded funds, options etc.

Roger has been recognized by many in the investment management industry for his expertise in portfolio management. Roger has been regularly interviewed by the financial press, trade journals, and television news shows. He has also had numerous technical articles published and has been quoted in a number of professional trade journals, newspapers, and consumer finance magazines. He appears frequently on CNBC Asia as a market commentator.

Visit: Random Roger

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.