I’m an Oil Speculator – It Was Ben That Told Me to Do It

So the president of the United States has ordered the Attorney General to go after the speculators who have been drive up the price of oil and therefore gas. What can I say about this? Does the President think the American people are stupid? No one is going to fall for this line of crap.

Up front, let me acknowledge my guilt in this matter. I’m a speculator. I try my best at it. Some of my best friends are speculators. Many of my readers are speculators. In one-way or the other we are all speculators. Those that don’t think they speculate are actually speculators.

My local oil delivery company let’s me play in the big casino. I bought an option at a fixed price for 5,000 gallons of heating oil. The premium for the option was 20 cents a gallon. So I paid them $1,000 cash. That was sort of gambling money. If the cash price were to fall I’d get the lower price. If it rises, my cost is locked in. Last I looked I was 70 cents in the money. My option cost was 20 cents so I’m “up” 50 cents on 5,000. That’s $2,500 so I’m feeling good on this spec.

It’s not hard to find ways to make money in a rising energy market. I don’t have the balls to trade Brent futures. I overweight energy names in the global stock market. It’s worked pretty well.

I have some investments with funds that do trade energy futures (a “macro” directional fund). They’ve been doing great. I have nothing to do with their market bets, but since I (and many others) provide the equity I have to take some responsibility for their actions.

So if the AG is looking for someone who’s hands are “dirty”, well, I guess I’m on the list. If he did look me up, I would tell him that it was the Ben Bernanke that told me to do it. If the Justice Department wants to lean on me they also have to lean on the Fed.

If the AG, Eric Holder, bothered to look it wouldn’t be too hard for him to see that the blame for all this speculating can be laid at the feet of the Fed. Mr. Holder will not need a PhD in Economics to make this conclusion. All he has to do is read the FAQ’s on the home page of the Federal Reserve. From the FAQ (link):

Monetary policy also has an important influence on inflation. When the federal funds rate is reduced, the resulting stronger demand tends to push wages and other costs higher.

Ah! This is easy. When the Federal Funds rate is low, inflation rises. The price of goods rise! So what is the policy on Federal Funds? Also easy. It has been ZERO for the past two and a half years! What’s the outlook for ZERO interest rates being maintained? That’s easy too!! The Fed tells us every six weeks or so:

Interest rates will be kept exceptionally low for an extended period of time.

So the Fed is telling us in its FAQ that they want goods to go up in price. Now all they have to do is push me into action as a speculator. More from the FAQ:

policy actions can influence expectations about how the economy will perform in the future, including expectations for prices

To me, this is pretty clear, hopefully Holder will agree. The Fed has succeeded in its effort to change my expectations of the future of my energy costs. With my expectations being influenced, it is only natural that I would react. When I pay $1,000 to lock in a price to heat my home it is exactly what Bernanke would want me to do. I’m the best evidence that he has that his policy is “working”.

I think most Americans understand that we import half our oil and that the value of the dollar is a big factor in the price we pay for crude. A weak dollar causes the price of oil to rise. So what’s the Fed’s policy on the dollar? Once more from the FAQ:

movements in the exchange value of the dollar represent an important consideration for monetary policy–such movements exert influence on U.S. economic activity and prices

Bingo! The desired consequence of the Fed’s monetary policy is to devalue the dollar in order to increase economic activity. But that same action also results in higher imported prices for crude. The only conclusion that I can come to is that higher oil prices are the desired consequence of Fed policy. Bernanke has brought me to the water and strongly suggested I should drink some. It’s all spelled out in the FAQs. Its not hidden in some obscure language. Shame on me (and the President) if I had ignored such an obvious outcome.

The President and the AG need to determine why folks like me are speculating rather than just blaming me for high prices. When they look at the facts they can’t help but see that it is Bernanke that’s behind all that high priced gas. The speculators like me are just the mechanism that Bernanke uses to achieve his ends.

Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

About Bruce Krasting 208 Articles

Bruce worked on Wall Street for twenty five years, he has been writing for the professional press for the last five years and has been on the Fox Business channel several times as a guest describing his written work.

From 1990-1995 he ran a private hedge fund in Greenwich Ct. called Falconer Limited. Investments were driven by macro developments. He closed the fund and retired in 1995. Bruce also been employed by Drexel Burnham Lambert, Citicorp, Credit Suisse and Irving Trust Corp.

Bruce holds a bachelor's degree in economics from Ithaca College and currently lives in Westchester, NY.

Visit: Bruce Krasting's Blog

2 Comments on I’m an Oil Speculator – It Was Ben That Told Me to Do It

  1. Interesting article. Thank you for posting it.

    Regarding speculation – as an economic behavior, mind you – it is something that is probably best minimized in any economy. That is because the more rampant speculation is, the more easily it introduces volatility and bubbles into the market, which in turn generate additional fear of the future, which in turns encourages more speculation. Please think about how that feed-forward process works.

    I would not say that speculation should be eradicated, as it serves a very useful purpose when used in a restricted manner, but when everyone begins to treat it as a quick way to earn $1K without doing any labor, it only feeds into the worst of human instincts – laziness, greed and fear.

    Sure, monetary policy is partly if not almost entirely to blame for the current dip in the dollar and the rise of oil prices, but that doesn’t mean speculation of the sort of you describe is okay. If you need that extra $1K to pay your energy bills (and if you can’t cut back), it would be better for all of us if you chose some other behavior to get that extra money than to sit at a console and input numbers. Please think about that, and perhaps you won’t be so selfish in the future, and the future won’t appear so uncertain.

    Thank you!

  2. Anyone who makes decisions based on an assumption of the future change in price of an item is by definition a speculator. The heating oil company is speculating it can get oil cheaper in the winter, and is willing to collect money now and commit to a price in anticipation of their price estimate coming true. Seem preposterous to ban this, because it helps with the cash flow and certainty of both the company and the individual who wont have to guess if his paycheck will cover the heating bills. Essentially all economic planning of individuals and firms falls under the “speculation” umbrella when one takes into account the unknown nature of future interest rates/money supply/taxation/etc. Speculation is also a zero (or even negative) sum game – the heating oil will actually be delivered at a certain price, and one or the other will have lost a potential profit. There is little risk that we will end up in a world where “everyone begins to treat it as a quick way to earn $1K without doing any labor”, because the number of losers = number of winners.
    “that doesn’t mean speculation of the sort of you describe is okay.”
    Speculation is nearly unavoidable, and in this case is likely making matters better for both parties. The only other option is to live in a world where everything is static – prices, wages, interest rates, production, consumer preferences – over all time periods. Should companies be banned from selling a product that may change value over time? Of course not.
    Secondly, speculation may lower volatility, as larger firms that aggregate capital can smooth fluctuations in price and profit off delivering the underlying item in a reliable way – exactly what the heating oil company is doing in this example. For the individual, this reduction in volatility is a great thing since he can plan that heating oil will cost no more than his option strike price. Are we going to eat every orange in the country in January? No, someone is going to speculate on the future price/supply/demand of OJ by purchasing and storing the product until July when the demand is higher and natural supply does not exist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.