When Will the Demand for a New Corn Federal Tax Break Begin?

Like most people who follow the federal budget closely, I tend to see federal spending and taxing implications in almost everything. Political unrest in Egypt get’s me to think about the level of aid the U.S. provides for that country and whether it will go up or down after the change in leadership that now seems inevitable. Big weather problems in the Midwest? Will states ask for federal funds to help with the cleanup? American athletes don’t do as well at an international competition as expected or hoped? Will there be a call for a tax break for those who contribute to their training?

That’s why this story in yesterday’s New York Times about size of corn reserves caught my eye.  The story says that, because of increased use by ethanol producers, the demand for corn in the U.S. is so high that reserves are at their lowest level in 15 years and prices are going up significantly (Note: the ethanol folks deny this). This is expected to affect consumer prices both on products that include are corn itself — chips, creamed, on the cob, salsa, etc. — and those where corn is a major component like soft drinks and gasoline.

So my federal budget self is wondering how long it will take before someone, or perhaps lots of people, start calling for some type of new federal tax break to encourage additional production of corn and, therefore, whether current budget estimates will have to be revised to account for the higher deficit from the revenue loss (I know: I really need to get out more).

Never mind that the higher prices themselves should provide all the incentive growers need to increase production, shift their efforts from another crop with a lower yield to corn, encourage research into farming methods that allow more to be grown per acre, etc.  Let’s put aside the fact that higher prices should reduce demand and, therefore, that the market should stabilize on its own.  The fact that there are substitutes for some uses of corn (I can get salsa without black beans, can substitute some other complex carb when I cook, and can use whole wheat instead of corn tortillas, for example) that will allow consumers to reduce the impact of the higher prices on their lives.  And let’s forget about the existing tax subsidies for ethanol.

The economic theory may well be beside the point.  I hope I’m wrong, but it looks to me as if there’s a potential broad coalition of producers and consumers that could come together to push for some type of new federal corn subsidy.  It’s worth watching.

Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

About Stan Collender 126 Articles

Affiliation: Qorvis Communications

Stan Collender is a former New Yorker who, after getting a degree from the University of California, Berkeley, moved to Washington to get it out of his system. That was more than 30 years ago.

During most of his career, Collender has worked on the federal budget and congressional budget process, including stints on the staff of the House and Senate Budget Committees; founding the Federal Budget Report, a newsletter that was published for almost two decades; and for the past 11 years writing a weekly column for NationalJournal.com and now RollCall.com.

He is currently a managing director for Qorvis Communications, where he spends most of his time working with and for financial services clients.

Visit: Capital Gains and Games

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.