Dashing Hopes for QE3

The FOMC just released their statement, dashing hopes for QE3.  We are still waiting on the press conference, but some quick thoughts.  First, the Fed does not appear to be particularly worried by recent weak data:

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April suggests that the economy has been expanding moderately this year. However, growth in employment has slowed in recent months, and the unemployment rate remains elevated. Business fixed investment has continued to advance. Household spending appears to be rising at a somewhat slower pace than earlier in the year. Despite some signs of improvement, the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation has declined, mainly reflecting lower prices of crude oil and gasoline, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

I suspect that the weak tone to recent data was countered by the relatively solid anecdotal tone of the Beige Book.  They do not appear to have marked down their forecasts as substantially as many believed.  Also, they may want additional data to confirm any recent weakness.

Second, they continue to state the case for more easing:

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects economic growth to remain moderate over coming quarters and then to pick up very gradually. Consequently, the Committee anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only slowly toward levels that it judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Furthermore, strains in global financial markets continue to pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook. The Committee anticipates that inflation over the medium term will run at or below the rate that it judges most consistent with its dual mandate.

Yet, despite making a clear case for aggressive policy, they still don’t follow it to its logical conclusion.  This is indeed maddening and is the primary reason market participants expect sizable QE is coming.  The FOMC sets ups the justification for easing meeting after meeting, and then simply does not deliver.

Third, consider the final line:

The Committee is prepared to take further action as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.

Now compare it to April:

The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability.

In April they specifically pointed to the balance sheet as the tool of choice.  Now they just promise further action.  Sounds like they intentionally want to take the focus off the balance sheet.  This could be a very important signal about the direction of future policy.  Do they view further QE as largely ineffective given low interest rates and constrained credit channels, and now reserve its use for only the most dire circumstances?  If not the balance sheet, then what?  Communication?  Perhaps I am reading too much into this line, but it seems to be a significant change.  I sure hope some reporter asks about this line at the press conference.  Hint, hint.

Finally, we still have a dissenter, Richmond Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Lacker.  The tone of the data was insufficient to change his mind that Operation Twist should end as scheduled.

Bottom Line:  Internally at the Fed, the risk/reward trade off still does not favor additional QE.

About Tim Duy 348 Articles

Tim Duy is the Director of Undergraduate Studies of the Department of Economics at the University of Oregon and the Director of the Oregon Economic Forum.

Visit: Economist's View

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*