Symbolic Deficit Reduction

The deficit battles in Congress are reaching a level of absurdity that makes your head spin. Every day brings new confirmation that the economic recovery is sputtering. GDP growth plunged in the 2nd quarter; consumer spending is anemic; the housing market has slumped; private-sector job growth has been well below 100,000 per month since May. Meanwhile, state and local governments are poised to cut another 300,000 jobs over the next year to deal with their acute budget shortfalls — that’s on top of about 200,000 jobs they have cut already.

Yet here is the Senate, bogged down for more than a month on a bill to provide $26 billion for states — $10 billion to prevent teacher layoffs and $16 billion for state Medicaid programs. David Rogers of Politico reports on the latest impass: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid hastily postponed a cloture vote Monday night because the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the bill wasn’t entirely paid for — tax changes and savings were still about $5 billion short. It also appears that Reid may acquiesce to Republican pressure for a cap on next year’s discretionary spending that would be $20 billion below Obama’s budget proposal.

It’s bad enough that Republicans — and it is Republicans — seem blissfully content to stand by as the economy slumps. But it’s an insult to voters to tout this pseudo-austerity as a blow for fiscal rectitude. $26 billion amounts to less than 2 percent of this year’s projected deficit. It is barely one-fifth the cost of a one-year extension of the Bush tax cuts, which Republicans want to make permanent without any offsets.

This is wrong on so many levels. Start with the fact that an enormous array of economists, including Fed chairman Ben Bernanke, say the economy is too weak to end stimulus programs just yet Indeed, many Fed officials probably wish the government was spending more, because the Fed’s own firepower is limited when long-term Treasury rates are already down around 3 percent. Fed officials are actively mulling new stimulus through monetary policy, but the ideas all seem at the margins. The WSJ says Fed officials are thinking the “symbolic” step of re-investing their mortgage-backed securities as they mature.

People can argue about how much Obama’s stimulus program has helped, though most economists say it did. But it’s very hard to argue that fiscal belt-tightening is a good idea this year, and it’s just plain nuts to argue that cutting $26 billion in aid to the states or $10 billion in supplemental jobless benefits will put us on the path to fiscal rectitude.

Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

About Edmund L. Andrews 37 Articles

Edmund L. Andrews spent two decades as a business and economics correspondent for The New York Times. During that time, he covered many of the nation ’s most transforming events, from the Internet and biotech revolutions to the emergence of capitalism in central Europe and Russia and the Federal Reserve under Alan Greenspan and Ben S. Bernanke. In 2009 he published BUSTED: Life Inside the Great Mortgage Meltdown (WW Norton), his own harrowingly personal account of the epic financial crisis. He has frequently appeared on major television and radio news programs, from the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer and Today to 20/20, All Things Considered, Lou Dobbs on CNN, the Colbert Show, BBC Worldwide, MSNBC and CNBC.

Ed began his affiliation with The Times in 1988 when he covered patents, telecommunications, and technology. In 1992, he joined the Washington bureau of The Times as a domestic correspondent and reported extensively on the business and politics surrounding the convergence of cable television, the Internet and broadband digital networks. In 1996, Ed became The Times’ European economics correspondent and its Frankfurt bureau chief. He returned to Washington in 2002 and became the bureau’s lead economics correspondent and The Times’ main eyes and ears on the Federal Reserve.

Prior to joining The Times, Ed worked as a magazine writer specializing in business and economics. Before that, he was an assignment editor for Cable News Network in Washington and an education and city government reporter at The Sentinel-Record in Hot Springs, Ark.

Ed graduated magna cum laude from Colgate University in 1978 with high honors in international relations. In 1981, he received a master’s degree in journalism from Northwestern University. He is married to Patricia Barreiro and has four children – Ryan, Matthew, Daniel and Emily.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.