As everyone knows, West Europeans live longer than Americans. In 1994-1998, the years for the study I am citing, Swedes lived 79.0 years, compared to 76.8 years for Americans. That is a 2.2 year advantage.
Generally, this difference is attributed to the health care policy. As you know, I believe that the public debate over-attribute effects to policy, and under-estimates other factors, including culture, norms and demography.
What fewer people know is that within the U.S, Mormons live far longer than non-Mormons. In Utah, LDS members live 6.5 years longer than non-members. This is a massive difference, indicating that life style, rather than health care system, is dominating the effect.
Overall, Utah (with low per capita income) has the third highest life expectancy in the U.S, after Hawaii and Minnesota (both incidentally states that are demographically unique).
What is even more impressive is that Mormons in the U.S lived 79.75 years, or 0.7 years longer than people in Sweden. (data again for 1994-1998. Sweden is above average in Europe, so the finding from this comparison applies even stronger to most other Europeans countries).
Do all the people who think the U.S should adopt the Swedish health care system to live longer advocate that Americans and Swedes convert to Mormonism to live longer?
I somehow doubt it.
Terrible American life style, combined with high crime and traffic deaths, are more likely explanations for the gap in life expectancy between the U.S and Europe than health care policy. An especially powerful piece of evidence for this is that rich Americans, who have access to all the health care they want, also live shorter than rich Europeans, who do not have access to better health care than the rest of the population.
Another fact that surprises most people is that the gap between the rich and the poor in the U.S in use of health care is not larger than the average of other OECD countries. Equal health is more a political slogan than reality in Europe, where the poor live much shorter than the rich.
The author claims: "In Utah, LDS members live 6.5 years longer than non-members." While true, it's not because Mormons live longer, it's because non-Mormons in Utah live *shorter.*
In fact, Utah is a wonderful experiment in how an intolerant majority can harm the health of a minority. See the study at the following link, which debunks the Mormon propaganda about how special Mormons are.
http://www.lds-mormon.com/utahunhealthy.shtml
Wow! Picking on the minority ethno-religious group that the Feds confined to Utah by pretending they are an abusive majority is the most over-the-top bit of bigotry I've seen in a long time. Hitler would love you, I'm sure.
Where is his documentation for asserting that Mormons live longer than non-Mormons in Utah? It certainly wasn't in the link he supplied.
Another factor, which I would like to see studied, may be the number of children per couple. I've seen stats that put Utah well above all other states. My thought is that people with more family (and closely-knit family — as Mormons typically have) have a stronger desire to stay alive longer. It gives them psychological stability that lonely old people lack.