How The Secret Service Scandal Protects Obama

Don’t assume that President Obama is terribly upset about the misbehavior of his Secret Service protectors in Colombia. The president now knows that a well-timed scandal can be a very useful thing.

As Obama begins to gear up his re-election campaign in earnest – a recent Rolling Stone interview was titled “Ready for the Fight” – he’s reaching out to young voters, one of the key blocs that put him in office four years ago.

After all, he wasn’t slow-jamming the news with Jimmy Fallon last week for the benefit of people like me. In the same vein, his picking a fight with Republicans about student loans is calculated to rally college students and recent graduates to the president’s side.

The president is much less keen to talk with young voters about marijuana and his role as commander in chief in the war on drugs.

In the Rolling Stone interview, Obama told publisher Jann Wenner, “What I specifically said was that we were not going to prioritize prosecutions of persons who are using medical marijuana. I never made a commitment that somehow we were going to give carte blanche to large-scale producers and operators of marijuana – and the reason is, because it’s against federal law. I can’t nullify congressional law.” He confessed that a gray area exists in the form of large-scale dispensaries that, he said, “may supply medical marijuana users, but in some cases may also be supplying recreational users.”

It isn’t only medical marijuana users, however, who feel left out in the cold by the president’s position. While they, along with some of Obama’s more liberal supporters, have said they feel betrayed by the administration’s continued raids of dispensaries in states where medical marijuana is legal, Latin American leaders are calling for a new drug war strategy.

At the Summit of the Americas in Cartagena, Obama rejected legalization as an answer to the trafficking that is spreading violence and corruption on both sides of the border (though mostly outside the United States). “I personally and my administration’s position is that legalization is not the answer, that in fact if you think about how it would end up operating, the capacity of a large-scale drug trade to dominate certain countries, if they were allowed to operate legally without any constraint could be just as corrupting, if not more corrupting than the status quo,” he said, according to the BBC.

The president’s argument is that if narcotics becomes just another big Latin American business, like mining, coffee or tourism, the industry will be “just as corrupting, if not more corrupting” as the status quo, which currently leads to the decimation of honest businesses, the murder of journalists, and the buying or burying of prosecutors and judges.

Obama’s comment, divorced from reality, reflects an American drug policy of “just say no, and spend more money on enforcement,” which has accomplished nothing constructive in over four decades. Drugs remain freely available in the U.S., while the drug war’s costs to societies in producing and transit countries mount.

At the Cartagena conference, Guatemalan President Otto Perez Molina called for “a responsible, serious dialogue in which we scientifically analyse what is happening with the war on drugs.” This is not a dialogue Obama wants to have, but he does not want American voters to focus on his slavish devotion to failed policies, either.

Enter the Secret Service scandal, which came along just in time to push the drug issue out of the headlines.

By late last week, nine Secret Service members had resigned or been forced out of the agency because of misconduct involving alleged prostitutes. Two dozen people, half Secret Service members and half military personnel, came under investigation in the scandal. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, has called for an independent review; Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., countered that such a demand was purely political maneuvering.

The president did some maneuvering of his own. He was happy to talk about the Secret Service in his Jimmy Fallon appearance, where, according to CNN, Obama said that “99.9%” of Secret Service agents do great work, and “[…] a couple of knuckleheads shouldn’t detract from what they do.”

The president is not in any hurry to explain to college students that he runs a drug lottery, which a huge percentage of them play. In most cases, recreational marijuana usage won’t hurt their careers or their futures. Occasionally, though, someone who is in the wrong place at the wrong time will find his or her life changed forever because of an arrest on a drug charge.

The hypocrisy is stunning. We have had three baby boomer presidents, and though the last two have avoided getting caught up in President Clinton’s rationalizations, we can safely assume all three did, in fact, inhale. They all went on to preside over drug policies that ruin other people’s lives for doing the same.

I’ve written before about the reasons legalization is overdue. I’m still waiting for the government to treat marijuana like milk, whose producers insist they cannot survive without federal price supports, or to acknowledge that cannabis does, in fact, have medical applications. In the meantime, it is clear that prohibition isn’t working. Even those who do not support total legalization are beginning to suggest more sensible alternatives in the face of such obvious failure.

The president doesn’t want to talk to young voters about pot. A fortuitously timed sex scandal means that, for now, he does not have to.

Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

About Larry M. Elkin 564 Articles

Affiliation: Palisades Hudson Financial Group

Larry M. Elkin, CPA, CFP®, has provided personal financial and tax counseling to a sophisticated client base since 1986. After six years with Arthur Andersen, where he was a senior manager for personal financial planning and family wealth planning, he founded his own firm in Hastings on Hudson, New York in 1992. That firm grew steadily and became the Palisades Hudson organization, which moved to Scarsdale, New York in 2002. The firm expanded to Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in 2005, and to Atlanta, Georgia, in 2008.

Larry received his B.A. in journalism from the University of Montana in 1978, and his M.B.A. in accounting from New York University in 1986. Larry was a reporter and editor for The Associated Press from 1978 to 1986. He covered government, business and legal affairs for the wire service, with assignments in Helena, Montana; Albany, New York; Washington, D.C.; and New York City’s federal courts in Brooklyn and Manhattan.

Larry established the organization’s investment advisory business, which now manages more than $800 million, in 1997. As president of Palisades Hudson, Larry maintains individual professional relationships with many of the firm’s clients, who reside in more than 25 states from Maine to California as well as in several foreign countries. He is the author of Financial Self-Defense for Unmarried Couples (Currency Doubleday, 1995), which was the first comprehensive financial planning guide for unmarried couples. He also is the editor and publisher of Sentinel, a quarterly newsletter on personal financial planning.

Larry has written many Sentinel articles, including several that anticipated future events. In “The Economic Case Against Tobacco Stocks” (February 1995), he forecast that litigation losses would eventually undermine cigarette manufacturers’ financial position. He concluded in “Is This the Beginning Of The End?” (May 1998) that there was a better-than-even chance that estate taxes would be repealed by 2010, three years before Congress enacted legislation to repeal the tax in 2010. In “IRS Takes A Shot At Split-Dollar Life” (June 1996), Larry predicted that the IRS would be able to treat split dollar arrangements as below-market loans, which came to pass with new rules issued by the Service in 2001 and 2002.

More recently, Larry has addressed the causes and consequences of the “Panic of 2008″ in his Sentinel articles. In “Have We Learned Our Lending Lesson At Last” (October 2007) and “Mortgage Lending Lessons Remain Unlearned” (October 2008), Larry questioned whether or not America has learned any lessons from the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s. In addition, he offered some practical changes that should have been made to amend the situation. In “Take Advantage Of The Panic Of 2008” (January 2009), Larry offered ways to capitalize on the wealth of opportunity that the panic presented.

Larry served as president of the Estate Planning Council of New York City, Inc., in 2005-2006. In 2009 the Council presented Larry with its first-ever Lifetime Achievement Award, citing his service to the organization and “his tireless efforts in promoting our industry by word and by personal example as a consummate estate planning professional.” He is regularly interviewed by national and regional publications, and has made nearly 100 radio and television appearances.

Visit: Palisades Hudson

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.