Is A Government Shutdown Inevitable?

I’ve been taking some serious grief from others in the federal budgeting community because of my now months-old prediction that a government shutdown was on the horizon, so I have to admit that it’s been a little gratifying to see much of the rest of the budget world moving toward that same conclusion this week. As this story by Alexander Bolton from yesterday’s The Hill shows, budgeting luminaries (and good friends) from both sides of the aisle such as Republican Bill Hoagland and Democrat Scott Lilly now seem to be coming to the same conclusion that I reached a while ago: A government shutdown, which up to about a year ago would have been considered a crazy idea given the experience with the last two in 1995 and 1995, is a real possibility.

But while gratifying, Bill’s and Scott’s quotes are actually less instructive than the one from Linda Bilmes, who teaches budgeting at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and led a discussion on the budget during the orientation for newly-elected members of Congress late last year (Full disclosure: I’ve led that discussion several times over the past decade and am not at all bitter about not being invited to do it again this time).  Here’s her money quote about what she observed at the orientation:

It was clear there was a group of new members who in my mind were more concerned with making statements than working with their own leadership to solve the nation’s problems,” said Bilmes. “Nothing I’ve seen in the last week changes my mind.

This is only part of the story.  As I’ve been saying for a while,  the House GOP leadership may have to agree to a shutdown to show the tea party folks that they are willing to do it.  They also need to show that the Republican Party will suffer real political pain from everyone but tea party supporters by shutting down the government.  As Bill Hoagland implies with his quote, the inability of the House Republican leadership to temper its tea party types last week on the continuing resolution is as strong an indication as you can get that it needs additional leverage over that faction of its caucus and the likely negative political reaction to a shutdown may be the best/only way it can get it.

Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

About Stan Collender 126 Articles

Affiliation: Qorvis Communications

Stan Collender is a former New Yorker who, after getting a degree from the University of California, Berkeley, moved to Washington to get it out of his system. That was more than 30 years ago.

During most of his career, Collender has worked on the federal budget and congressional budget process, including stints on the staff of the House and Senate Budget Committees; founding the Federal Budget Report, a newsletter that was published for almost two decades; and for the past 11 years writing a weekly column for and now

He is currently a managing director for Qorvis Communications, where he spends most of his time working with and for financial services clients.

Visit: Capital Gains and Games

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.