Intel (INTC) Gets A Big European Fine

In a fairly long post yesterday, I wrote about antitrust policy and touched on the Intel (INTC) situation with the European Commission. They announced their findings with regard to Intel’s alleged anti-competitive behavior today, so here’s a quick follow-up.

The commission fined Intel $1.45 billion and summed up its findings thusly:

In blunt words, the EU’s steely competition commissioner, Neelie Kroes, pronounced that her agency’s long investigation had “uncovered serious wrongdoing in the x86 processor market,” including proof that Intel had given partially or completely hidden rebates to computer makers on the condition that they buy all or nearly all of their x86 processors from Intel and not its smaller rival, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

The allegations against Intel which were brought by their competitor AMD was that Intel gave rebates to its customers on the condition they buy exclusively from Intel or buy a large percentage of their chips from Intel. Though the European Commission says that this activity resulted in harm to consumers, there seems to be some real questions as to whether that is in fact true.

Intel plans to appeal the commission’s findings. They contend that they ignored a substantial amount of evidence that mitigated against their findings.

As I noted yesterday, the Obama administration has signaled that its antitrust policy might align more closely with the European model. That model is one that seeks to regulate activities between firms as much as it seeks to ensure that the consumer is not harmed by monopolistic behavior. It is effectively a back door industrial policy masquerading as antitrust enforcement. It would be unfortunate if the administration takes U.S. policy in that direction.

More: here

Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

About Tom Lindmark 401 Articles

I’m not sure that credentials mean much when it comes to writing about things but people seem to want to see them, so briefly here are mine. I have an undergraduate degree in economics from an undistinguished Midwestern university and masters in international business from an equally undistinguished Southwestern University. I spent a number of years working for large banks lending to lots of different industries. For the past few years, I’ve been engaged in real estate finance – primarily for commercial projects. Like a lot of other finance guys, I’m looking for a job at this point in time.

Given all of that, I suggest that you take what I write with the appropriate grain of salt. I try and figure out what’s behind the news but suspect that I’m often delusional. Nevertheless, I keep throwing things out there and occasionally it sticks. I do read the comments that readers leave and to the extent I can reply to them. I also reply to all emails so feel free to contact me if you want to discuss something at more length. Oh, I also have a very thick skin, so if you disagree feel free to say so.

Enjoy what I write and let me know when I’m off base – I probably won’t agree with you but don’t be shy.

Visit: But Then What

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.