What a Sad Commentary on Politics

Apparently, it is possible to write a whole New York Times article on Harold Ford considering a run for Senate in New York without mentioning a single position he has on any issue. Read it here. It’s about donors and fundraising, not issues and constituencies. And even with all the political commentary in the article, I still cannot figure out if the presumed dissatisfaction with incumbent Kirsten Gillibrand is because she is too far to the Left or to the Right.

Looking for more disappointment? Consider these three excerpts:

Those who have expressed interest in a Ford campaign remain skittish about discussing it publicly, citing Ms. Gillibrand’s power over billions of dollars in financing around the state.

Why should an incumbent U.S. Senator have such power? Is there no better way to do our national budget than to give Senators walking-around money? Or how about this:

But he [Ford] has a formidable track record as a fund-raiser. During his Senate run [in Tennessee], he amassed about $15 million, with about a fifth of his contributions coming from New York.

I’m sure the good people of Tennessee appreciated the influence that out-of-staters had on their election. As I’ve said before, this should be banned.

In New York, Mr. Ford took a job as vice chairman of Merrill Lynch, where he cultivated close ties to many of the Wall Street executives who are now encouraging him to run.

Well, that’s reassuring. I certainly wouldn’t want New York to elect a Senator who hadn’t cultivated close ties with Wall Street executives, who have been the paragons of virtue over the last couple of years.

Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

About Andrew Samwick 89 Articles

Affiliation: Dartmouth College

Andrew Samwick is a professor of economics and Director of the Nelson A. Rockefeller Center at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire.

He is most widely known for his work on the economics of retirement, and his scholarly work has covered a range of topics, including pensions, saving, taxation, portfolio choice, and executive compensation.

In July 2003, Samwick joined the staff of the President's Council of Economic Advisers, serving for a year as its chief economist and helping to direct the work of about 20 economists in support of the three Presidential appointees on the Council.

Visit: Andrew Samwick's Page

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.