Many Variable Annuity Investors Remain Confused And Angry

Variable annuities have had a bad rap for some time. They are expensive, with brokers charging commissions between seven and ten percent of the amount invested. They are extremely difficult to understand, due to layers of opaque surrender charges and fees. And – because of tax deferrals – variable annuities are not appropriate for retirees, even though many brokers can’t resist the fat commissions for selling variable annuities to older investors.

A variable annuity is a kind of insurance product that offers a guaranteed future payout in return for paying into an account now, as was noted last week in the Wall Street Journal. Because the contract is “variable” and pegged to the return of a stock index like the S&P 500, “the payout can swell if investments in the account perform well over time,” according to the Journal’s Matthias Rieker.

“Brokers who sell them can earn big commissions and, according to investors’ lawyers, too often target people for whom they aren’t suitable, including many elderly investors,” Rieker reported. He cited one investor who was awarded $112,000 recently by an industry arbitration panel. The broker who sold all of the annuities had placed them into the clients tax-deferred IRA account, a strategy “that makes no sense” because it cancels out the annuities tax benefit, according to the attorney handling the arbitration claim.

Meanwhile, industry newspaper InvestmentNews last week also pointed to another potential hazard for variable annuity investors: clients are facing a “ticking time bomb” of potential forced annuitizations that will cancel out certain death benefits that are among the most attractive features of variable annuities.

“Buried within the fine print of variable annuity prospectuses, insurers detail the conditions under which they will distribute a client’s annuity in the form of a stream of payments,” reported Darla Mercado. Insurance companies “are now pushing to begin disbursement of the account as soon as possible. This has been particularly debilitating for clients who have death benefits that are significantly larger than their account values. What’s worse, is that there’s no way out of the contractual agreement.”

This is complicated stuff, but what remains easy to comprehend is that investing in variable annuities turns into bad news for plenty of brokerage clients. The Journal report noted that investor lawsuits stemming from variable annuities surged in 2012. The investor claims fell back in 2013, but still outpaced the number of investor claims involving stock and mutual fund lawsuits.

The best financial advisers tend to shy away from a quick easy sale of a variable annuity. The low rate of return, long surrender period with steep penalties for early withdrawal and fat commissions make such advisers nervous. If a broker approaches you with a variable annuity that sounds too good to be true, it probably is!

Zamansky LLC are securities and investment fraud attorneys representing investors in federal and state litigation against financial institutions.

Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

About Jacob H. Zamansky 58 Articles

Jacob (”Jake”) H. Zamansky is one of the country’s foremost authorities on securities arbitration law, the legal recourse for investors claiming broker wrongdoing, or for brokers claiming wrongful termination or other misconduct by their employer. Zamansky & Associates, the New York-based law firm he founded, represents both individuals and institutions in complex securities, hedge fund, and employment arbitrations.

Mr. Zamansky was at the forefront of recent efforts to “clean up” Wall Street. In 2001, he successfully sued former Merrill Lynch analyst Henry Blodget on behalf of a New York pediatrician misled by Blodget’s stock research. The case’s successful resolution was the catalyst for New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer to investigate the conflicts of interest on Wall Street and resulted in the well-reported $1.4 billion Global Settlement, which included many of the biggest names on Wall Street.

More recently, Mr. Zamansky is one of the leading litigators and opinion leaders of the subprime mortgage crisis and the related hedge fund collapses, representing both investors and mortgage borrowers who were defrauded by Wall Street firms and mortgage lenders. Among Mr. Zamansky’s early actions is filing the first arbitration case on behalf of institutional and high net worth investors against Bear Stearns Asset Management with regard to the two hedge funds which collapsed as a result of exposure to subprime mortgage backed securities. He also has filed claims on behalf of individual investors victimized by brokers that steered their portfolios into unsuitable subprime stocks and mortgage borrowers who were fraudulently coerced into inappropriate mortgage and investment transactions.

Earlier in his career, Mr. Zamansky worked for more than 30 years as a litigator, including positions at Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom LLP. His tenure also included serving as a federal prosecutor with the Federal Trade Commission.

A native of Philadelphia, Mr. Zamansky has been a frequent expert commentator on CNBC, CNN, and FOX News and has published opinion pieces in The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times and USA Today. He is regularly quoted and his cases have been chronicled in major financial and news publications including The New York Times, USA Today, The Washington Post, BusinessWeek, Fortune and Forbes. He is a frequent lecturer for industry and legal groups around the country. He also writes a blog that can be viewed here.

Visit: Zamansky & Associates

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.