Wall Street Will Prepare Ways to Gut The Volcker Rule

The ink is not even dry on the new Volcker Rule, designed to stop investment banks from speculative trading for their own gains and limits their ability to invest in hedge funds. But Wall Street and its bankers are surely starting to look for ways around the rule, which was finalized last week and created after the financial crisis as a way to limit banks’ participating in high risk strategies.

Banks, of course, are seeking exemptions, loopholes and new ways to interpret the rule, rather than designing ways to fully comply with it, according to news reports.

Why are all the Wall Street lawyers and lobbyists frantically working on trying to eliminate or reduce the impact of the Volker Rule? It’s simple. Bank executive compensation depends on the profits they reap from speculative trading.

The new regulations will ban banks from proprietary trading, and prevent them from owning over 3% of hedge funds and private-equity funds.

Banks fear that the rules could cost them billions of dollars by making it more difficult to engage in activities that are permitted under the regulation, such as market-making, underwriting and hedging against risks. Expect the lawyers to go through the proposals to see what could be struck down in court.

Since the passing of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999, banks, brokerages and insurance companies could act in consort under one large roof. That law, which repealed restrictions that prohibited such alliances between disparate financial institutions, in place since the Great Depression, allowed banks to act more like speculative hedge funds than lenders of capital to businesses and consumers.

Many believe that the financial crisis of 2008 largely resulted from Gramm-Leach-Bliley, which allowed banks to take 40–1 leverage and enormous risks with other people’s money. Before the financial crisis, that level of risk was typically associated with private investment pools like hedge funds, not global, publicly traded financial institutions such as Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns.

The Volcker Rule, a centerpiece of Dodd-Frank financial reform law, has gray areas and loopholes. You can bet the house that investment bankers and their attorneys will spend the coming weeks and months looking to discover ways to take advantage of any weaknesses.

“The rule, which aims to draw a line between everyday banking and risky Wall Street activities, has its limits,” wrote Ben Protess and Peter Eavis last week for the New York Times. “For example, the regulation leaves it largely up to the banks to monitor their own trading. Some critics of Wall Street also wanted chief executives to attest that their bank was actually in compliance with the rule, not just that it was taking steps to comply.”

“And in another concession to Wall Street, regulators will delay the effective date of the rule to July 2015,” Protess and Eavis reported. “Until then, bank lawyers are expected to scour the rule for loopholes and to consider bringing lawsuits against the regulators.”

“While outlawing proprietary trading, the rule allows banks to continue buying stocks and bonds for their clients – a process known as market making – and to place trades that are meant to hedge their risks,” Protess and Eavis reported. “But the line between proprietary trading and these more legitimate practices is blurry at best.”

“The rule also allows banks to do proprietary trades in bonds issued by governments,” they wrote.

Wall Street’s coming drive to gut the Volcker Rule will show that bankers have yet to learn the lessons from the financial crisis. Despite the Volcker Rule, Wall Street remains thirsty for risk and exorbitant executive pay. Securities regulators must stand firm against Wall Street and work to protect the American investing public by making sure that Wall Street does not abuse the Volcker Rule.

Zamansky LLC are investment and stock fraud attorneys representing investors in federal and state litigation and arbitration against financial institutions.

Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

About Jacob H. Zamansky 58 Articles

Jacob (”Jake”) H. Zamansky is one of the country’s foremost authorities on securities arbitration law, the legal recourse for investors claiming broker wrongdoing, or for brokers claiming wrongful termination or other misconduct by their employer. Zamansky & Associates, the New York-based law firm he founded, represents both individuals and institutions in complex securities, hedge fund, and employment arbitrations.

Mr. Zamansky was at the forefront of recent efforts to “clean up” Wall Street. In 2001, he successfully sued former Merrill Lynch analyst Henry Blodget on behalf of a New York pediatrician misled by Blodget’s stock research. The case’s successful resolution was the catalyst for New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer to investigate the conflicts of interest on Wall Street and resulted in the well-reported $1.4 billion Global Settlement, which included many of the biggest names on Wall Street.

More recently, Mr. Zamansky is one of the leading litigators and opinion leaders of the subprime mortgage crisis and the related hedge fund collapses, representing both investors and mortgage borrowers who were defrauded by Wall Street firms and mortgage lenders. Among Mr. Zamansky’s early actions is filing the first arbitration case on behalf of institutional and high net worth investors against Bear Stearns Asset Management with regard to the two hedge funds which collapsed as a result of exposure to subprime mortgage backed securities. He also has filed claims on behalf of individual investors victimized by brokers that steered their portfolios into unsuitable subprime stocks and mortgage borrowers who were fraudulently coerced into inappropriate mortgage and investment transactions.

Earlier in his career, Mr. Zamansky worked for more than 30 years as a litigator, including positions at Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom LLP. His tenure also included serving as a federal prosecutor with the Federal Trade Commission.

A native of Philadelphia, Mr. Zamansky has been a frequent expert commentator on CNBC, CNN, and FOX News and has published opinion pieces in The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times and USA Today. He is regularly quoted and his cases have been chronicled in major financial and news publications including The New York Times, USA Today, The Washington Post, BusinessWeek, Fortune and Forbes. He is a frequent lecturer for industry and legal groups around the country. He also writes a blog that can be viewed here.

Visit: Zamansky & Associates

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.