In a recent video shared by Stanford University, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt made a bold prediction about the future of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on the tech industry.
pic.twitter.com/GBBUIS1ek0 https://t.co/qz35ADaZD9
— Eric Jackson (@ericjackson) August 22, 2024
Schmidt’s comments have ignited a fierce debate about the potential valuation of Nvidia (NVDA), the company at the forefront of the AI revolution.
Schmidt’s assertion that major companies are planning to invest anywhere from $20 billion to $100 billion in AI data centers, with a significant portion of that spending directed towards Nvidia’s AI accelerators, has caught the attention of industry analysts and investors alike.
This projection, if realized, could catapult Nvidia into a realm of valuation previously unimaginable for a semiconductor company.
Eric Jackson, founder and portfolio manager at EMJ Capital, took Schmidt’s prediction and ran with it, painting a picture of Nvidia’s potential future that is both tantalizing and daunting.
Jackson’s calculations suggest that if hyper scalers were to spend $300 billion each on Nvidia products over the next few years, the company would be sold out for the next four years. This scenario could lead to a staggering 2027 net income estimate of $132 billion.
But the numbers don’t stop there. Jackson’s projections indicate that if Nvidia were to trade at 65 times its forward price-to-earnings ratio, the company’s valuation could skyrocket to $8.5 trillion, with a per-share value of $340.
These figures represent a seismic shift in the tech landscape, potentially positioning Nvidia as one of the most valuable companies in the world.
If you buy that FY27 number, Nvidia traded down to 17x forward earnings 2 Mondays ago… why is it worth 17x, 23x another day, 65x another day… ?
— Eric Jackson (@ericjackson) August 21, 2024
However, Jackson is quick to temper this optimistic outlook with a dose of reality. He emphasizes the inherent volatility of high-return stocks like Nvidia, pointing out that as recently as August 5, the stock was trading at just 17x forward earnings. This stark contrast underscores the rollercoaster nature of investing in cutting-edge technology companies.
“These volatile names have the best returns but you have to live with the 35 – 80% drawdowns,” Jackson cautioned, highlighting the risk-reward tradeoff that comes with investing in companies at the forefront of technological revolutions.
Nvidia’s current market position is undeniably strong. Under the leadership of Jensen Huang, the company has established a near-monopoly in the market for AI accelerators, leveraging its first-mover advantage and integrated suite of AI solutions. The popularity of AI applications like OpenAI’s ChatGPT has only fueled demand for Nvidia’s products, cementing its status as the flagbearer of the AI revolution.
Yet, as with any rapidly evolving technology sector, questions remain. Can Nvidia maintain its dominant position as competitors inevitably enter the market? Will the projected demand for AI infrastructure materialize as Schmidt and others predict? And perhaps most importantly, can investors stomach the wild swings in valuation that come with betting on the future of AI?
As the AI revolution continues to unfold, Nvidia stands at the center of a perfect storm of technological innovation, market demand, and investor enthusiasm.
Whether Eric Schmidt’s bold predictions come to fruition or not, one thing is certain: the journey of Nvidia and its investors promises to be anything but boring.
Price Action
Nvidia is set to report its second-quarter fiscal 2024 results on August 28, 2024. Analysts are expecting substantial growth, with revenue projections around $28.65 billion, marking a significant 112% increase compared to the same quarter last year.
This earnings report holds particular importance as it will act as a key indicator of the AI industry’s overall health and Nvidia’s leading position within it.
As of the latest update, NVDA shares were down by $4.76 or 3.70%, trading at $123.74 per share.
Leave a Reply