The reason Mr Hall won’t do this is that he wants the profits, but not the liability, which is the achilles heel of our banking system today. You can’t cry socialism when it was never written into the Constitution that you right to profit off of speculative dividends won with tax dollars- without any possibility of financial liability in the event of a loss.

Mr. Hall is in a far better position than the one it was suggested I work toward.

Here is the bottom line : If Hall leaves Citibank, my money follows him. It is certain he knows that. And for the simplest of reasons. Anyone who will give me $5 out of every six HE earns… can work for me anytime.

It is understandable that Politicians may not think this cool, but if you will please notice : Politics is not business. Business is not politics. And when you mix them, Freedom becomes very rare.

The forced renegotiation of Mr. Halls CONTRACT (!!!!!!!!!!!) is one of those events that compare to the Camels nose in the tent or the Romans crossing the Rubicon. It bodes BIG CHANGE. Your choice is either say, “None of that, Thank you!” or you can wait for the BIG CHANGE.

Just how much authority does a guvment have? The authority to unilaterally redefine a contract? Just like a treaty with a tribe of …should I continue?