The Next Potential Bailout

Whenever Bernanke heads to the Hill for these Humphrey Hawkins road shows there’s a theme that pops out amid all the banality. It’s usually indicative of the hot button for politicians and these days that theme provides a good clue of the next potential bailout.

The theme this week was commercial real estate. It’s almost as if the senators and representatives had an “aha moment” as it dawned on them that things were not going swimmingly in the land of big real estate. More likely, is that a lot of lobbyists have been whispering help in their ears lately.

Probably all you need to know about what direction the winds are blowing is to consider the comments of Chris Dodd and Barney Frank, the chairmen of the Senate and House committees that hear from Bernanke on these occasions. Dodd suggested that the looming commercial real estate crisis could, “…even dwarf the residential problems.” and Frank said, “…there’s a great deal of fear” that commercial defaults will produce something similar to residential real estate defaults.

Bernanke for his part fell back initially on the TALF. He noted that the Fed was gearing up to buy some CMBS in the hopes that this would jump start the market but he strained to warn those assembled that might not be enough.

As Bloomberg reports, he’s suggesting further help might be needed:

It “may be appropriate” for the government and Congress to consider “fiscal” steps to support the industry, Bernanke said today. Ideas for fresh support for the market could include government guarantees for commercial mortgages, Bernanke also said today, while noting no proposal on the subject has emerged.

Can you see son of TARP or PPIP or something taking shape here. Once again, do anything to put off the day of reckoning. Right now the watchwords for commercial real estate lenders are extend and pretend. Extend maturities and pretend everything is OK or will become OK. The will become OK part is where the government comes in.

A fair slice of the commercial real estate loans now in jeopardy were uneconomic at birth. They relied on excessively high valuations and unreachable proforma income projections. These loans would have been problematically in a good economy, in a bad one, they have embedded losses that can’t be papered over by even the most agressive of government bailout programs.

Sadly, we’re probably fated to relive the S&L debacle. A lot of forebearance, extensions of loan maturities and other types of chicanery on the hope that things get better. They don’t as we learned once before. Sooner or later, the true value of the assets will have to be recognized, some banks are going to fail and then we can get on with business, just like we did before.

About Tom Lindmark 401 Articles

I’m not sure that credentials mean much when it comes to writing about things but people seem to want to see them, so briefly here are mine. I have an undergraduate degree in economics from an undistinguished Midwestern university and masters in international business from an equally undistinguished Southwestern University. I spent a number of years working for large banks lending to lots of different industries. For the past few years, I’ve been engaged in real estate finance – primarily for commercial projects. Like a lot of other finance guys, I’m looking for a job at this point in time.

Given all of that, I suggest that you take what I write with the appropriate grain of salt. I try and figure out what’s behind the news but suspect that I’m often delusional. Nevertheless, I keep throwing things out there and occasionally it sticks. I do read the comments that readers leave and to the extent I can reply to them. I also reply to all emails so feel free to contact me if you want to discuss something at more length. Oh, I also have a very thick skin, so if you disagree feel free to say so.

Enjoy what I write and let me know when I’m off base – I probably won’t agree with you but don’t be shy.

Visit: But Then What

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*