A Bad News Day on Jobs

Well, we might as well get this out of the way now. The employment numbers were uniformly horrible. Let’s jump into this cesspool.

First the numbers. From the DOL, initial claims for unemployment insurance were down 16,000 to 614,000 while the four-week moving average declined 2,750 to 615,250. That, of course, is not the big news. That comes from the BLS and they reported that 467,000 jobs were lost in June. The unemployment rate stayed about the same at 9.5%. This is a major setback as it reverses a trend of declining rates of job losses. These charts from the BLS pretty much tell the story.

This from the Curious Capitalist puts this recession in its awful perspective.

Here are the reactions of economists on the WSJ Real Time Economics Blog:

  • This was a very ugly labor market report, and there is no amount of lipstick that can improve its image. Indeed, not only does it suggest that the pace of job losses in the U.S. remains very high, it bucks the trend of four consecutive months of improvement in the pace of job losses. Moreover, with conditions in the U.S. economy continuing to be very weak, there is little to suggest that a turnaround in U.S. labor market conditions is on the horizon. –Millan L. B. Mulraine, TD Securities
  • Yes, the drop in payroll employment has moderated from the 700,000+ results reported over the winter when panic and paralysis was the order of the day. But, private sector job losses in excess of 400,000 this deep into a recession cannot be viewed as anything but terrible news. –Joshua Shapiro, MFR Inc.
  • The headline payroll drop overstates underlying job losses because of the 49,000 decline in federal employment, which was largely due to the layoff of temporary census workers (which boosted payrolls in April)… Nonetheless, the rate of private sector job losses is slowing (the peak rate of job losses was the November–February period) and we expect that trend to continue… We are encouraged that both the narrow and broad measures of unemployment rose only marginally in June and this, along with the slowing in the rate of private sector job losses, further suggests that the recession is drawing to a close. –RDQ Economics
  • The payroll number is very disappointing. We had hoped to see a third straight movement back towards the 200,000 or so implied by the level of jobless claims, but instead the gap widened again, suggesting gross hiring remains extremely weak. The deterioration from May was mostly in services… In short, labor market is still terrible; don’t be swayed by a small unemployment rate rise. Wages will soon be falling outright, a classic deflation signal. –Ian Shepherdson, High Frequency Economics
  • Services and construction accounted for most of the steeper declines with bigger layoffs prevalent across most industry groups. On a slightly less discouraging note, job losses in manufacturing were the smallest since last November. Excluding the motor vehicle industry, declines in manufacturing jobs have gotten progressively smaller for six straight months. –Nomura Global Economics
  • We have a suspicion that the influx of school leavers into the labor market may have been a factor as well, as the numbers finding jobs appear to have been lower than allowed for in the usual seasonal adjustments. The alternative household survey measure shows an 83,000 decline in employment among 16 to 19 year olds last month, while the unemployment rate for that age cohort jumped to 24.0%, from 22.7%. As a result, teenagers accounted for 22% of the 374,000 decline in household employment despite making up only 11% of the labor force. –Paul Ashworth, Capital Economics
  • The larger than expected decline in private payrolls reflected a quickened pace of job loss in sectors such as construction and temp help. Meanwhile, the decline in census-related jobs in the government sector appeared to be right in line with our expectation (-50,000). Also, it’s worth noting that employment at auto dealers fell only 9,000 during June and we are likely to see much sharper declines in this category over the course of coming months. –David Greenlaw, Morgan Stanley
  • Interestingly, the only areas that showed any growth in employment were the already bloated sectors of education and health care. As a nation we already spend too much, and employ too many people, in these industries. Our current economic problems will not be solved by hiring more teachers and medical technicians. Our ultimate recovery must be led by a resurgence in manufacturing, which according to today’s numbers, continues to spiral lower. –Peter Schiff, Euro Pacific Capital
  • The worst of the contraction may be behind us but the economy is still in consolidation and will be through year end. Specifically, the 467,000 decline in payroll jobs was about 100,000 more than the Street had been anticipating. The composition of the job loss was also well balanced with goods producing firms cutting staffing levels by 223,000 as service producing cut employment by 244,000. –Steven Ricchiuto, Mizuho Securities
  • Job losses and the weak average hourly wages data suggest weak consumer incomes and thereby consumer spending. The second half gain in GDP will be dominated by federal spending. The test will be if much of the transfer payments are saved, not spent. In the personal income data released last week you saw that most of the money was saved. –John Silvia, Wachovia Economics Group
  • The green shoots in the job market are hard to find. Businesses are determined to trim costs by cutting payrolls. Expecting sluggish recovery in demand in the foreseeable future, employers want to make sure that a sustained economic recovery is here before hiring. The job market will become the Achilles’ heel of the coming recovery. –Sung Won Sohn, Smith School of Business and Economics
  • The details of the June employment report show a distressing degree of slack in the labor markets and a significantly weaker track for personal income. These trends will continue over coming months, and the process of reversing them will be a lengthy one. –Richard F. Moody, Forward Capital

OK, we know employment is a lagging indicator and there have been some positive signs in other metrics so let’s not slit our wrists. At the same time, we are digging a hole that is so deep that crawling out of it is going to take years. All of these people do have to find jobs again sometime and I suspect, as do many others, that the numbers understate the extent of the problem. There are a lot of people working for ten of twelve bucks an hour that used to make multiples of those numbers. That’s what you do to survive. So as we all probably know intuitively, the truth is worse than the picture the numbers paint.

About Tom Lindmark 401 Articles

I’m not sure that credentials mean much when it comes to writing about things but people seem to want to see them, so briefly here are mine. I have an undergraduate degree in economics from an undistinguished Midwestern university and masters in international business from an equally undistinguished Southwestern University. I spent a number of years working for large banks lending to lots of different industries. For the past few years, I’ve been engaged in real estate finance – primarily for commercial projects. Like a lot of other finance guys, I’m looking for a job at this point in time.

Given all of that, I suggest that you take what I write with the appropriate grain of salt. I try and figure out what’s behind the news but suspect that I’m often delusional. Nevertheless, I keep throwing things out there and occasionally it sticks. I do read the comments that readers leave and to the extent I can reply to them. I also reply to all emails so feel free to contact me if you want to discuss something at more length. Oh, I also have a very thick skin, so if you disagree feel free to say so.

Enjoy what I write and let me know when I’m off base – I probably won’t agree with you but don’t be shy.

Visit: But Then What

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*