Pelosi’s Office: Summary of the Tentative Agreement

From Office of Speaker Nancy Pelosi — Sept. 28, 2008



Significant bipartisan work has built consensus around dramatic improvements to the original Bush-Paulson plan to stabilize American financial markets — including cutting in half the Administration’s initial request for $700 billion and requiring Congressional review for any future commitment of taxpayers’ funds. If the government loses money, the financial industry will pay back the taxpayers.

3 Phases of a Financial Rescue with Strong Taxpayer Protections

  • Reinvest in the troubled financial markets … to stabilize our economy and insulate Main Street from Wall Street
  • Reimburse the taxpayer … through ownership of shares and appreciation in the value of purchased assets
  • Reform business-as-usual on Wall Street … strong Congressional oversight and no golden parachutes


Democrats have insisted from day one on substantial changes to make the Bush-Paulson plan acceptable — protecting American taxpayers and Main Street — and these elements will be included in the legislation

Protection for taxpayers, ensuring THEY share IN ANY profits

  • Cuts the payment of $700 billion in half and conditions future payments on Congressional review
  • Gives taxpayers an ownership stake and profit-making opportunities with participating companies
  • Puts taxpayers first in line to recover assets if participating company fails
  • Guarantees taxpayers are repaid in full — if other protections have not actually produced a profit
  • Allows the government to purchase troubled assets from pension plans, local governments, and small banks that serve low- and middle-income families

Limits on excessive compensation for CEOs and executives

New restrictions on CEO and executive compensation for participating companies:

  • No multi-million dollar golden parachutes
  • Limits CEO compensation that encourages unnecessary risk-taking
  • Recovers bonuses paid based on promised gains that later turn out to be false or inaccurate

Strong independent oversight and transparency

Four separate independent oversight entities or processes to protect the taxpayer

  • A strong oversight board appointed by bipartisan leaders of Congress
  • A GAO presence at Treasury to oversee the program and conduct audits to ensure strong internal controls, and to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse
  • An independent Inspector General to monitor the Treasury Secretary’s decisions
  • Transparency — requiring posting of transactions online — to help jumpstart private sector demand
  • Meaningful judicial review of the Treasury Secretary’s actions

Help to prevent home foreclosures crippling the American economy

  • The government can use its power as the owner of mortgages and mortgage backed securities to facilitate loan modifications (such as, reduced principal or interest rate, lengthened time to pay back the mortgage) to help reduce the 2 million projected foreclosures in the next year
  • Extends provision (passed earlier in this Congress) to stop tax liability on mortgage foreclosures
  • Helps save small businesses that need credit by aiding small community banks hurt by the mortgage crisis—allowing these banks to deduct losses from investments in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stocks
About Ron Haruni 1033 Articles
Ron is the Co-Founder & Editor in Chief of Wall Street Pit. Web Site: Wall Street Pit

2 Comments on Pelosi’s Office: Summary of the Tentative Agreement

  1. O.K. our good government secretly sent Washington Mutual over to J.P. Morgan for a song and a dance. J.P. Morgan got a good deal overnight.
    WM’s depositors are suppossedly safe for now.
    What about the good people who invested their money in WM by buying stock in this company.
    How many shares of WM stock were on the books when all of this went down?
    How much money was paid out by these investors who purchsed WM stock?
    Where did that money go?
    Did the government take care of these WM investors or did they only take care of the barrowers and depositer.
    Lets see some conversation on this topic.

  2. Hard to tell why the government is only taking care of borrowers and depositors leaving investors out. It is absolutely insane. One think I do know though is the gov. started this whole mess in the first place. Go back to 1999, when Fannie Mae was under pressure by the Clinton administration to find a way to get more loans to “borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans.” They started a pilot program which soon became general policy. Money start flowing to people who couldn’t afford to pay it back. In 1999 there was roughly $5 trillion in total U.S. mortgage debt. That number got to $12 trillion by 2007. You think the govt. was not aware of the consequences?. Here is the ARTICLE published september 1999. As I said, is just mind boggling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.