Peak Soil Investment: This Quiet Land Grab is Just Beginning

By Jun 12, 2009, 12:14 AM Author's Blog  

According to the Economist, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and China have been “quietly” buying up more than $20 billion of this asset.

It’s not oil or natural gas assets though. And it’s not the molybdenum they need to build thousands of miles of new pipelines. They’re buying up one of my favorite long-term investments, farmland.

The way things are shaping up, investors who follow their lead now will do exceptionally well in the short-term and long-term. Let me explain.

Another Case of Great Expecations

It’s no secret we’re facing a big opportunity in agriculture. It’s something we’ve delved into quite a bit over the past few years.

Still though, there are a lot of people who haven’t “bought in” to the opportunity here. The thing most investors still fail to understand about agriculture is last year’s credit crunch is a good thing. I expect it to go a long way to making a great opportunity even better.

Right now, official estimates for this year’s crop are far too optimistic. Currently, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) expects world grain production to rise 4.9% this year. And they’re expecting an increase of 3.1% in 2010.

Granted, that sounds reasonable to most people. But they’re not reasonable expectations at all.

You see, these are very rosy expectations for so many reasons. First, you have to consider that 2008 was one of the top three crop production years in history. The sharp rise in crop prices over the past few years sent farmers around the world into full production mode. The past two years were exceptional. Even though, demand still outstripped supply and food riots broke out around the world.

Also, agriculture production doesn’t grow that fast. It grows at a snail’s pace. An average year will see about 1% to 2% growth – maximum. The past few years have been an exception, not the norm.

The final thing the USDA is missing is agriculture production goes hand in hand with the economy. According to a recent report by Credit Suisse, “[2009] would be the first global recession to coincide with increased crop production.”

So the USDA growth estimates are downright laughable. That’s good news for us though. The misguided USDA is helping keep the window of opportunity open. And when we look through that window, we can see a very big opportunity.

It’s All Relative

The agriculture boom has a lot more room to run than most people realize.

A research report from Credit Suisse– released earlier this week shows how much higher agriculture prices realistically could go. The chart below, excerpted from the bank’s report explains it all.

Peak Soil Investment: This Quiet Land Grab is Just Beginning

The chart shows the Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) foodstuffs price index (bold line) relative to the CRB metals index (thin line) over the past 28 years in real (inflation-adjusted) terms.

As you can see, there is a lot more upside left for agriculture. And that’s despite the great run agriculture has had over the past few years, the correction during the credit crisis, and rally going on now.

For instance, metals prices soared between 2002 and 2008. The CRB metals index more than quadrupled. Needless to say, they were hot. But agriculture, only caught on near the end of the rally.

Basically, the chart shows food prices have a lot more room to run. If food prices only return to their inflation-adjusted highs of the early 1980’s, they’re double from here. If they climb as high as metals did, they could triple.

The biggest gains won’t be had in agriculture commodities like wheat, corn and soybeans though. They’ll be in the producers of those commodities. And when it comes to agriculture, the only producer is farmland.

Leveraging Up on Agriculture

The secret to making a fortune in commodities is leverage. Just take a look at what has happened over the past few years. Gold prices have quadrupled, but dozens of gold mining stocks (even the larger ones) have watched their shares climb 1,000% or more.

The same is true for silver, copper, zinc, and most other metals. The underlying metal price climbs and the miners of those metals absolutely soar.

Miners, as the producers of metals, always offer more leverage.

The same is true for farmland. But there’s something unique about farmland which offers much more upside than mining stocks that performed exceptionally well during the metals boom.

In mining, when commodity prices rise, a global land grab ensues. The big money sees profit opportunity and billions of dollars start flowing into exploration and mine development projects to open new mines. During the last metal boom, dozens of new mines opened up.

It’s simple economics. Demand goes up. Prices go up. Eventually supply catches up to meet demand. It works on the way up and the way down.

That’s mining though. There are a lot of potential mines out there. When it comes to farmland though, there isn’t much more farmland left in the world.

As the chart below shows, the world has practically reached “Peak Soil.”

Peak Soil Investment: This Quiet Land Grab is Just Beginning

As you can see, the amount of new farmland created over the past 48 years is tiny. The total increase in arable and permanent cropland has been a paltry 13%. That’s an annual expansion rate of 0.27% per year.

Whether the farmland was created by tearing down rain forests, converting pasture to crop producing land, or using technologically advanced seeds, chemical fertilizers, and irrigation to turn marginal farmland into more productive, the world is running out of ways to create more farmland.

We’ve reached Peak Soil.

Of course, there are other considerations here. The introduction and improvement of genetically modified organics (GMO) have gone a long way to increasing crop yields from the finite soil, but the gains in productivity from here will be limited. Soil quality is declining and those banner years of crop production will start to plateau.

Of course, there are two questions which have to be answered before putting your investments dollars to work. First, we have to figure out where. In this case, farmland offers a lot. Second, we have to figure out when. The way things are shaping up, the time is now.

Hitting Paydirt

The credit crunch has been hard on a lot of people. Unemployment continues to rise around the world. Manufacturing activity is down. The economy, despite showing some signs of turning around (which will be short-lived – less than two years), is still in decline.

It has been tough on everyone – including farmers. The value of farmland has fallen drastically around the world when valued in U.S. dollars according to the Economist.

In the past year, the only major crop producing to see the value of its farmland rise is in the United States. Everywhere else is showing a completely different picture.

Farmland prices are off 12% in the Canadian prairies. They’re down nearly 18%% in Brazil. In Russia and Bulgaria, farmland has dropped anywhere from 20% to 35% depending on the region.

The biggest drop, however, had been in Ukraine. Farmland prices have plummeted more than 70%. The price of Ukraine’s fertile acres has been hit hard for two reasons. First, the overall decline in global farmland values has impacted Ukraine. Second, the combination of political instability and a law preventing ownership of farmland (it’s only available for lease – even though those leases can run 30 to 60 years).

The combination of a tremendous upside combined with an industry that is still feeling the pain from the recession, overly optimistic expectations for this year’s worldwide harvest, and the upside potential make farmland a very attractive place to buy right now.

Remember, investing is all about risk and reward. Right now the risk of a decline in farmland is small and the upside, well…if crop prices only double, you’ll see farmland values soar higher and faster.

So if you’re looking to put some “safe” money to work, in a sector which has fallen out of favor, and one which is facing a secular growth trend which has years ahead of it (what we’re always looking for at the Prosperity Dispatch), right now farmland is definitely worth a look.

The big money in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and China are getting on board. Maybe you should too.

By Andrew Mickey

  • SHARE:
  • Share on StockTwits

10 Comments

  1. Franz says:

    The chinks and the rag heads shouldn’t be allowed to purchase any property on US soil. Period!!
    No foreigners to own farm land should not be allowed. If you think that they don’t know what the hell their doing, just wait and see the rise in food prices in the coming future. They will hold us hostage just as they did with Oil.
    So keep them out of our farm lands and let them eat dirt and sand.
    Since the Arabs don’t have any farm land, why do you think they are investing in ours?! Contact your congress person and let them know that should vote NO!!!! MFKERs

  2. m_astera says:

    Excellent points, but there are a couple of common fallacies in this writeup. One is that the introduction of GMO crops has increased yield. Not so; as a rule GMO crops produce less. Their advantage is that they are resistant to herbicides, which means weeds can be easily controlled by spraying. That translates into less fuel use, as traditional cultivation and plowing is greatly reduced.

    The second fallacy is that the quality of farmland must necessarily decrease. This only happens when the soil is “mined” for the minerals that in essence equal fertility. Plants need at least seventeen mineral nutrients, humans and animals at least thirty. If the only fertilizers used are those containing Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium (NPK) while the other minerals are only extracted and not replaced, farmland will decline in fertility. Yield may not suffer for a number of years, though the nutritional value of the crops will become less and less. Eventually the soil reserves of the other essential minerals will become so low that insect and disease problems become overwhelming. The solution is simple: replace the missing, mined out minerals. Calcium is a major one, and is much cheaper than NPK.

    Those interested in improving farmland rather than depleting it will find a good overview of the situation from both the conventional and alternative agriculture points of view here: http://www.soilminerals.com/TIS_Ch1.htm

    FULL DISCLOSURE: The link is to a page on my website, and I am selling a book, but there is enough free info there to educate most anyone. Why not buy some worn-out farmland cheap and make it better than new?

  3. Goldstein says:

    Franz, forget about the ragheads and the chinks. We already own your country. We own the Fed. We own Hollywood and the media. We own your mind, Franz!

    • Conspiracy2Riot says:

      Ha. How fitting you, named ‘Goldstein’, would reply in such a manner. Goldstein is about as code as ‘banker’ is, if you catch my drift.

      And yes, ‘you people’ DO own our media, finance industry and everything else in America. I for one find it extremely displeasing.

  4. TahoeBilly says:

    Hey Goldstein,

    Inside every jewish American is a real American trying to get out!

  5. Ehrig says:

    I did some work studying European Farm policy in grad school. Did you know that European farms have yields between x5 and x20 what American farms get for comparable climate and soil? And the kicker is that this isn’t a good thing. If you look at ag economics, the basic rule for farmers on the world market is that prices drop every year. This drives farmers to always be looking for the most economic and efficient ways to produce food. If your techniques make you a profit for an average season this year, and you don’t improve them, in a decade you’ll be out of business. However, in Europe, they prop up the price of agricultural commodities. This means that farmers can spend a lot more on inputs (chemicals, labor, capital, technology, etc) because they know they’ll make up the money on the back end. This isn’t necessarily a good thing that Europe does this — Europe ends up producing massive surpluses of unwanted ag goods. But it illustrates the idea that if food prices rise, there’s lots and lots of hidden capacity in the system to meet increased demand. If prices rise, it starts making more sense economically to spray for weeds twice instead of once, or to bring in to production more marginal farmland, etc. etc.

  6. Lyle says:

    @Michael Astera

    I checked out your link and was very impressed, at first. Your description of the New Agriculture was inspiring, until I came to this sentence: “Regardless of their intent, neither the granola heads nor the nature nazis have proven to have much of a clue when it comes to the big picture.”

  7. Cody says:

    I wouldn’t ban foreigners from buying land or any property in America … I do think the U.S. should establish a policy of reciprocity. We should match land and property purchasing laws of nation of origin (I’d also match import/export regulations). As an American, try to buy land in Mexico. Sell a car to Japan, and they take it apart and put it back together before its allowed to ride on the road (as part of their ‘safety inspection process’). If we can’t buy their land, they can’t buy ours. If they allow citizens to purchase land with undo influence/regulation, we match it.

  8. David says:

    We may not have much choice in the future about who buys our farmland. If the Fed and the Treasury continue being stupid with their fiscal and monetary policies, the dollar and USTreasuries will become less and less valuable. Our creditors, the Chinese, Japanese, Russians, and other buyers of our garbage paper will start to demand value for value of their “investments.” They could very well show up with an ultimatum: Either hand over Federal land for the mining and farming rights, or they will immediately sell their dollars and bonds, crashing our system totally. It’s not so far-fetched when you really think about it. They could walk away (in a manner of speaking) with interstate highways (now toll roads), idle factories, national parks, farmland, fishing rights on the great lakes and off-shore, lots of things. And all because we wanted to pay the lowest prices every day, and sold our souls to the rest of the world so that we could shop at big box stores for plastic crap that provides no increase in our standard of living.

    Got gold?

  9. Conspiracy2Riot says:

    We cannot sustain the level of growth we saw in the 20th Century, nor should we try. Color me a Nature Nazi I guess. I think we need to start thinking in terms of globalizing LOCAL economies not producing and selling all over the world. Finite resources are going to dry up and on their way out they’re going to be very expensive. No country is shielded from Climate Change. Nor will they be from food riots. If I’m hungry, I’m going to steal and I’m going to try to take whatever I need from whomever I can. Of course, I’ll have my list of rich folks ready to go so I can tap them first. I’m putting Goldstein at the top of it.

LEAVE A COMMENT

SPY192.69  chart-1.38  chart -0.71%
GOOG532.71  chart+6.17  chart +1.17%
AAPL102.99  chart+0.52  chart +0.51%
TSLA231.10  chart-4.24  chart -1.80%
BBRY9.89  chart-0.26  chart -2.56%
NFLX374.65  chart+8.66  chart +2.37%
FB78.37  chart-0.32  chart -0.41%

Nikkei15217.21  chart+21.44  chart +0.14%
Shanghai2305.627  chart-20.926  chart -0.90%
UK6399.73  chart+27.40  chart +0.43%
France4105.09  chart+23.85  chart +0.58%
Germany8940.14  chart+53.18  chart +0.59%