What’s The Economic Stimulus Equivalent of the Immaculate Reception?

Over at Economist’s View, Mark Thoma comments on a piece by Joseph Stiglitz from Monday’s Financial Times that questions the value of using monetary rather than fiscal policy to deal with the economy. Stiglitz makes a number of very good points (you can almost hear the frustration in his writing), but he quickly goes past what I see as the money quote:

The Fed has bought more than a trillion dollars of mortgages and long-term bonds, the value of which will fall when the economy recovers – precisely the reason why no one in the private sector is interested. The government may pretend that it has not experienced a capital loss because, unlike banks, it does not have to use mark-to-market accounting. But no one should be fooled.

Substitute “Congress” or “The White House” for “The Fed” in the above graph and the real reasons monetary policy is now the only economic game in town become immediately apparent: it doesn’t appear to cost anything, doesn’t add to the budget deficit, and doesn’t require any votes by members of Congress.

That’s not to say that the Fed won’t be criticized for whatever type of quantitative easing it ultimately proposes. But the criticism will be far more muted and pose far fewer political dangers for the typical Democrat and Republican members of the House and Senate than would a vote to buy a trillion dollars of anything.

Stiglitz and Thoma argue that monetary policy might not be the most effective way to deal with the economy (in fact, it might not be in the top 10) it now is likely to be the only thing the federal government can do to make something happen.

That makes it remarkably analogous to Franco Harris’ infamous “immaculate reception” against the Oakland Raiders in 1972. It clearly wasn’t the way the most efficient way for the Pittsburgh Steelers to score, but it was the only thing that was available at the time.

For anyone too young to remember, here’s the clip of that play. It will all make sense if you think of the U.S. economy as the monetary policy equivalent of Terry Bradshaw.

About Stan Collender 126 Articles

Affiliation: Qorvis Communications

Stan Collender is a former New Yorker who, after getting a degree from the University of California, Berkeley, moved to Washington to get it out of his system. That was more than 30 years ago.

During most of his career, Collender has worked on the federal budget and congressional budget process, including stints on the staff of the House and Senate Budget Committees; founding the Federal Budget Report, a newsletter that was published for almost two decades; and for the past 11 years writing a weekly column for NationalJournal.com and now RollCall.com.

He is currently a managing director for Qorvis Communications, where he spends most of his time working with and for financial services clients.

Visit: Capital Gains and Games

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.