Comments on: ClimateGate Will Change the Rationale From “Warming” to “Green Jobs”

By: John

John — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:51:51 +0000

He walks all over the USA Congress like the leftist dictator he is.. He cares nothing for the people and only about his communist agenda.. Congress should cut off all funding to the EPA asap.. CO2 is .038 of 1% of our atmosphere.. Water vapor (main greenhouse gas) is 80%.. Is water next on the commasar’s list?

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:04:01 +0000

- Top NASA Climate Scientist: Copenhagen Must Fail… Researcher: NASA hiding climate data…
- AFP: Czech president attacks Al Gore’s climate campaign…
- Nick Griffin confronts ClimateGate NWO – Video – A Must Watch…
- NASA’s Latest Discovery: SUN HEATS THE EARTH (June, 2009) – Robert Calahan at NASA’s Goddard Space Center… article in the Daily Tech: “NASA Study Acknowledges Solar Cycle, Not Man, Responsible for Past Warming”… World’s Largest Science Group Rejecting Man-Made Climate Fears…
- PENTAGON: GLOBAL WARMING might suddenly trigger a massive GLOBAL COOLING… Now the PENTAGON TELLS BUSH (Guardian.co.uk., 22 February 2004): climate change will destroy us… BRITAIN WILL BE ‘SIBERIAN’ in less than 20 years:
http://cristiannegureanu.blogspot.com/2009/12/nick-griffin-confronts-climategate-nwo.html

By: John Smith

John Smith — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:03:49 +0000

The C&T will never pass the senate. The day those emails were confirmed was the day that legislation was buried. I agree with you on the EPA. They can’t even do the job that they suppose to do now. So I doubt they will ever do anything with CO2.I have to say we do live in strange times.

By: jallen

jallen — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:43:08 +0000

Very interesting take from across the pond:

Barack Obama’s use of the EPA to pressurise the Senate to pass his climate change … shows his dictatorial mentality. He wants to override Congress, which is hostile to his climate gobbledegook because it is representative of the American electorate, and sideline the nation’s elected Senators by ruling by decree, courtesy of the EPA. This is a coup d’état.

Fortunately, the world’s leading democracy, which he is trying to subvert, has guarantees of liberty so deeply embedded in its Constitution that US citizens are well placed to fight back.

In the first place, regulation can be challenged in a way that laws cannot. So the EPA’s proposed ruling on so-called “Greenhouse Gases” can be opposed extensively with litigation, to the point that the ruling might not yet be in force when Obama demits office. In the second place, the EPA is funded by Congress. So, if the Agency is being used to bypass or neuter Congress, why should legislators not play hardball and retaliate by cutting off its funding?

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100019206/climategate-barack-obamas-rule-by-epa-decree-is-a-coup-detat-against-congress-made-in-britain/