<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FHFA Summary of the Foreclosure Prevention Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wallstreetpit.com/12375-fhfa-summary-of-the-foreclosure-prevention-data/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wallstreetpit.com/12375-fhfa-summary-of-the-foreclosure-prevention-data</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken  Bonin</title>
		<link>http://wallstreetpit.com/12375-fhfa-summary-of-the-foreclosure-prevention-data#comment-82896</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken  Bonin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wallstreetpit.com/?p=12375#comment-82896</guid>
		<description>The requirement that the home has to be purchased before 01/01/09 seems
unfair especially when a person loses their job after purchasing.
Is there any exception to this requirement ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The requirement that the home has to be purchased before 01/01/09 seems<br />
unfair especially when a person loses their job after purchasing.<br />
Is there any exception to this requirement ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
