Do We Have the Economic Depth to Retreat Into Autarky?

When time permits I read a lot of blogs. When it’s tight I make sure to visit a couple selected sites. One is Yves Smith’s Naked Capitalism. I frequently disagree with her and she often sets my blood boiling but she never fails to get past the trivial and key in on real issues.

Her post today covering the growing tensions between the Chinese and the Obama administration over interest and exchange rates is a case in point. I disagree with some of her statements but the overall conclusion that low interest rates, artificially managed yuan exchange rates and persistent economic lethargy in the U.S. will lead to no good is one with which I am in complete agreement.

She quotes from Krugman’s latest missive on the subject, though I find him to be more of an echo chamber these days than a forward thinker. She also cites Ambrose Evans-Pritchard who has never been shy about going out on a limb. Here is a snippet of his thoughts on the subject:

If provoked, the US has the economic depth to retreat into near autarky (with NAFTA) and retool its industries behind tariff walls – as Britain did in the 1930s under Imperial Preference. In such circumstances, China would collapse. Mao statues would be toppled by street riots.

Evans-Pritchard has been sounding this sort of alarm since the beginning of the crisis. That his sometimes dire view of the outcome has not yet come to pass is no reason to suppose that it won’t. So far governments have been able to muddle along and avert the unthinkable, yet in doing so the West and the U.S. in particular have not succeeded in engendering any sort of meaningful economic rebound.

Unemployment at the level that currently exists in this country is politically untenable. If it continues for even a few more months or as some postulate actually deteriorates further then the unthinkable can quickly become a political movement. When Smith or Evans-Pritchard talk about capital controls or extreme protectionist measures it might sound like fear mongering but it might well prove to be highly prescient.

The fact is that during times of extreme global economic duress the end game of mutual destruction usually favors the more developed countries that tend to be net importers. The 1930s pretty much proved this point. While the results are less wealth for everyone the pain is not evenly distributed. That lesson has not been forgotten and the plan is one that any politician will wheel out when their survival depends upon it.

About Tom Lindmark 401 Articles

I’m not sure that credentials mean much when it comes to writing about things but people seem to want to see them, so briefly here are mine. I have an undergraduate degree in economics from an undistinguished Midwestern university and masters in international business from an equally undistinguished Southwestern University. I spent a number of years working for large banks lending to lots of different industries. For the past few years, I’ve been engaged in real estate finance – primarily for commercial projects. Like a lot of other finance guys, I’m looking for a job at this point in time.

Given all of that, I suggest that you take what I write with the appropriate grain of salt. I try and figure out what’s behind the news but suspect that I’m often delusional. Nevertheless, I keep throwing things out there and occasionally it sticks. I do read the comments that readers leave and to the extent I can reply to them. I also reply to all emails so feel free to contact me if you want to discuss something at more length. Oh, I also have a very thick skin, so if you disagree feel free to say so.

Enjoy what I write and let me know when I’m off base – I probably won’t agree with you but don’t be shy.

Visit: But Then What

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.