<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compensation Reform? Please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wallstreetpit.com/10970-wall-street-compensation-reform-in-name-only/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wallstreetpit.com/10970-wall-street-compensation-reform-in-name-only</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SODDI</title>
		<link>http://wallstreetpit.com/10970-wall-street-compensation-reform-in-name-only#comment-67641</link>
		<dc:creator>SODDI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wallstreetpit.com/?p=10970#comment-67641</guid>
		<description>An easy way to deter abuses such as Citigroup&#039;s $100 million bonus payout to their energy futures wunderkind is a simple change in the IRS accounting rules. Bonuses over 10K would be considered part of the firm&#039;s NET profits (and taxable as such) and not considered to be expenses.

Either that, or we could start warming up the tumbrils.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An easy way to deter abuses such as Citigroup&#8217;s $100 million bonus payout to their energy futures wunderkind is a simple change in the IRS accounting rules. Bonuses over 10K would be considered part of the firm&#8217;s NET profits (and taxable as such) and not considered to be expenses.</p>
<p>Either that, or we could start warming up the tumbrils.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

