Stephen Moore of the WSJ is Wrong

Steve Moore wrote a column published by the Wall Street Journal yesterday that tried very hard to use the results of a recent Gallup poll to convince everyone a massive taxpayer revolt is close at hand.  There are two problems: He’s misreading the poll and he’s doesn’t understand its implications.

Some background: The Gallup poll Moore referred to in his column was released about 10 days ago.  As I posted earlier this week, “(t)he poll shows that, on average, Americans today believe that 50 cents of every federal tax dollar is wasted.”  The problem was that the poll didn’t define what it meant by waste.  Some respondents undoubtedly felt that some programs could be implemented more efficiently.  Others very likely thought it was a complete waste for the government to be doing something — foreign aid for example — at all and that every dollar was wasted.  As a result, the poll may be interesting but its anything but instructive.  I called it “worthless.”

But Moore, who before coming to the Journal was head of the anti-federal spending Club for Growth, sees in the the poll’s results things that he wants to see even if they’re not really there.

For example, he says the poll indicates that the “…Republicans’ strategy of creating a unified bloc of ‘no’ votes to Obama spending initiatives…is in line with where voters are.”  The poll actually says nothing of the kind, especially for respondents who defined waste as federal spending that doesn’t in any way benefit them.  In that case, they may not want fewer initiatives and less spending, they just want less spending on things for others.  The “no” strategy Moore cites could, therefore, be exremely damaging.

Moore then says “the polling suggests something even bigger: Americans are in the mood for a radical shrinking of government in order to reduce debt and waste.”  That’s wishful thinking in the extreme.  Does he really believe that most Americans want to cut radically any program from which they personally benefit?  We know from what is now decades of experience that, regardless of whether Congress and the White House are controlled by Republicans or Democrats, there is little public appetitite for reducing spending signiicantly and that the only real question is what spending gets increased.  Everyone has a favored program or two.  That means that there’s no way the 15 percent across-the-board reduction in every program that Moore demands could ever happen.

Moore also says that there’s “… a powerful voter backlash…” against the spending that’s been approved over the past year even there’s certainly nothing in the poll that says that.  It’s actually just as easy to say that many voters are angry because they don’t see how the initiatives helped them or because they’re not producing results they wanted as quickly as hoped.  If cash for clunkers is any indication, programs that people like are not considered wasteful even if economists say they’re inefficient.

Moore has an extraordinary ability to label anything he doesn’t like as spending even when it’s something else.  For example, he refers to the stimulus bill enacted earlier this year as “…little more than a refill of the budgets of every left-wing program Democrats have wanted to throw money at for 40 years.”  Unfortunately for Steve, he has conveniently forgotten the stimulus included a significant amount of tax cuts, including yet another one-year patch for the alternative minimum tax.

Anyone who has heard Moore on CNBC or read his columns over the years knows that he thinks of federal spending as a tool of the devil.  He could look at a cloud formation or an ink blotch and see something in it that he will say is an indication the government should cut back.  It’s not surprising, therefore, that he sees taxpayer and voter revolts in his sleep.  Like the cloud formations, however, that’s more in his mind than in the poll results.

About Stan Collender 126 Articles

Affiliation: Qorvis Communications

Stan Collender is a former New Yorker who, after getting a degree from the University of California, Berkeley, moved to Washington to get it out of his system. That was more than 30 years ago.

During most of his career, Collender has worked on the federal budget and congressional budget process, including stints on the staff of the House and Senate Budget Committees; founding the Federal Budget Report, a newsletter that was published for almost two decades; and for the past 11 years writing a weekly column for and now

He is currently a managing director for Qorvis Communications, where he spends most of his time working with and for financial services clients.

Visit: Capital Gains and Games

1 Comment on Stephen Moore of the WSJ is Wrong

  1. Bullsh1T Stan you are putting your spin on it. I am calling you out and saying YOU LIE!!! Must be nice to have a position of power to abuse like you do. I bet if someone murdred someone in cold blood with 30 eye witnesses,you would turn it around and say the guy that was shot deserved it somehow,better yet you would probably blame him and say he grabbed the gun and shot himself even though his hands never touched the gun!! People like you with Agendas wil always lie though STAN.IT is typical of your kind. KEEP UP THE WORK STAN. You are who we thought you were(as a recent footbal coach said)!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.